Can You Change Your Attachment Style? What the Science Actually Says
You took an attachment style quiz, read the description, and felt a sinking recognition. Anxious. Avoidant. Fearful-avoidant. The label fits, maybe uncomfortably well. And now the question that actually matters: is this permanent, or can you change it?
The short answer is yes. The longer answer is more nuanced, more interesting, and more empowering than most pop-psychology articles suggest. Research spanning four decades demonstrates that attachment styles are relatively stable but meaningfully changeable, particularly when you understand the specific personality traits and relational experiences driving your pattern (Fraley et al., 2011).
This is not wishful thinking or self-help optimism. It is one of the most robust findings in modern relationship psychology. And it begins with a concept called earned security.
What Is Earned Secure Attachment?
The term "earned security" was introduced by researchers studying adults who had difficult or inconsistent early caregiving but who, as adults, demonstrated secure attachment patterns in their relationships. These individuals did not simply outgrow their insecurity. They built security through deliberate experience and reflection (Roisman et al., 2002).
Here is what makes earned security different from lifelong security:
- Continuous secure attachment develops from consistent, responsive caregiving in childhood. These individuals never had to "learn" security because their earliest experiences taught them that others could be trusted.
- Earned secure attachment develops later in life, often through therapy, healthy relationships, or deep self-reflection. These individuals did experience insecure attachment earlier, but they developed the capacity for security through corrective experiences.
The critical finding: researchers cannot reliably distinguish earned-secure adults from continuously-secure adults on measures of relationship quality, parenting behavior, or emotional regulation (Roisman et al., 2002). In other words, earned security is not a lesser version of security. It is the real thing.
Why Attachment Styles Can Change: The Science
Understanding why change is possible requires looking at what attachment styles actually are. They are not fixed personality types. They are working models, mental representations of self and others that your brain built from repeated relational experiences (Bowlby, 1988). And working models update when new experiences contradict old expectations.
Evidence From Longitudinal Research
Several large-scale studies have tracked attachment styles over time and found significant change:
- Fraley and colleagues (2011) analyzed data from over 20,000 participants and found that while attachment styles show moderate stability, they also show meaningful variation across time. Individual differences in change trajectories were associated with both personality traits and relationship experiences.
- Chopik and colleagues (2019) tracked attachment changes across the lifespan and found that both attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance tend to decrease with age, particularly during periods of stable romantic partnership. The average adult becomes somewhat more secure over time.
- Waters and colleagues (2000) found that attachment security measured in infancy predicted attachment security at age 20 only about 64% of the time, meaning that over a third of individuals showed meaningful change in either direction between childhood and early adulthood. Stressful life events, particularly loss of a parent, were the strongest predictors of negative change.
This is not a picture of rigid stability. It is a picture of a system that responds to experience.
The Personality Connection
Your attachment style does not exist independently of your broader personality. Research by Noftle and Shaver (2006) demonstrated that attachment dimensions are significantly correlated with Big Five personality traits, with attachment anxiety showing a strong link to Neuroticism (r = .49) and attachment avoidance correlating with lower Extraversion and lower Agreeableness.
This matters for change because personality traits themselves change over time. The principle of personality maturation describes how most people become more emotionally stable (lower Neuroticism), more agreeable, and more conscientious as they age (Roberts et al., 2006). These same personality shifts naturally support movement toward secure attachment.
In other words, the personality traits that fuel insecure attachment are not fixed either. When your Neuroticism decreases, the soil that anxious attachment grew in becomes less fertile. When your Agreeableness increases, the emotional distance that characterized avoidant attachment becomes harder to maintain.
What Drives Attachment Style Change
Not all experiences shift attachment equally. Research points to several key drivers of change, each operating through different mechanisms.
1. Secure Romantic Relationships
The single most powerful catalyst for attachment change is a relationship with a securely attached partner. Mikulincer and Shaver (2007) describe this as a process of security provision: when a partner consistently responds to your emotional needs with warmth, reliability, and appropriate boundaries, your working models gradually update.
This process works because it provides the exact corrective experience your attachment system needs. If you are anxiously attached, a secure partner's consistency teaches you that not every moment of distance means abandonment. If you are avoidantly attached, a secure partner's patience demonstrates that vulnerability does not always lead to rejection or engulfment.
The key word is consistently. A single reassuring conversation does not rewire years of relational learning. Earned security develops through hundreds of small moments where your partner's response contradicts your expectation.
2. Therapy and Structured Self-Reflection
Attachment-focused therapy, particularly Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) and attachment-based psychodynamic therapy, has strong empirical support for shifting attachment patterns (Johnson, 2019). These approaches work by:
- Helping you identify your attachment cycle in real time
- Creating a safe space to experience vulnerability without the consequences you expect
- Building new relational responses through repeated practice with a therapist who models secure relating
- Developing narrative coherence around your attachment history, a specific predictor of earned security
Research on narrative coherence is particularly compelling. Adults who can tell a coherent, reflective story about their early attachment experiences, acknowledging both the pain and what they learned from it, are significantly more likely to show earned security than those who either dismiss their early experiences or remain overwhelmed by them (Main et al., 2008).
3. Close Friendships and Community
Romantic partners are not the only source of corrective attachment experiences. Deep friendships, mentoring relationships, and community belonging can all contribute to attachment security (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). This matters particularly for people who are not currently in romantic relationships.
The mechanism is the same: repeated experience with someone who responds to your emotional needs reliably. A friend who consistently shows up when you are struggling, a mentor who believes in your capacity even when you doubt it, a community that accepts you without requiring you to perform, these relationships expand your working models of what you can expect from others.
4. Deliberate Self-Awareness Practice
Understanding your attachment style is itself a change agent. Research on mindfulness and attachment shows that people who develop the capacity to observe their attachment responses without being controlled by them show increases in attachment security over time (Shaver et al., 2007).
This is where personality assessment becomes a practical tool for growth, not just self-knowledge. When you know that your attachment anxiety is amplified by high Neuroticism, you can recognize the panic response as a trait-driven signal rather than evidence of a real threat. When you understand that your avoidant patterns are connected to lower Agreeableness and Extraversion, you can make deliberate choices to stay engaged even when your instinct is to withdraw.
Specific Paths for Each Attachment Style
The journey toward security looks different depending on where you start.
Moving From Anxious to Secure
If you experience anxious attachment, your core challenge is learning to tolerate uncertainty without interpreting it as danger. Your attachment system is calibrated to detect threats to closeness, and it sounds the alarm too often and too loudly.
Practical steps that research supports:
- Develop self-regulation skills before seeking reassurance. When the panic hits, practice pausing before acting on it. Notice the urge to text, call, or confront, and give yourself 20 minutes before responding. This does not mean ignoring your feelings. It means creating space between the trigger and your response.
- Build multiple sources of security. Anxious attachment often involves placing all your emotional eggs in one relational basket. Investing in friendships, meaningful work, and personal interests distributes your sense of safety so that one person's behavior cannot shatter it.
- Choose partners who are consistent, not just exciting. Anxious attachment is often drawn to partners who trigger the attachment system, creating intensity that feels like love but is actually anxiety. Secure partners may feel less thrilling initially but provide the stability that enables genuine change.
Moving From Avoidant to Secure
If you experience avoidant attachment, your core challenge is learning to approach vulnerability rather than managing it through distance. Your attachment system learned that needing others leads to disappointment, so it protects you by suppressing the need itself.
Practical steps that research supports:
- Practice small disclosures. You do not need to share your deepest wounds to start building intimacy. Begin with smaller emotional disclosures and notice that the world does not end when you let someone see you.
- Notice your deactivating strategies. Avoidant attachment operates partly through deactivation, automatically suppressing feelings of closeness or need. Learning to catch yourself in the act of pulling away is the first step toward choosing a different response.
- Reframe dependence as strength. Research consistently shows that secure dependence on a partner is associated with greater autonomy, not less (Feeney, 2007). Allowing yourself to rely on someone does not make you weak. It gives you a secure base from which to explore the world more confidently.
Moving From Fearful-Avoidant to Secure
If you experience fearful-avoidant attachment, also called disorganized attachment, your challenge is the most complex: you simultaneously crave and fear closeness. Your attachment system has conflicting instructions, approach and avoid, that create a chaotic relational experience.
Practical steps that research supports:
- Therapy is especially important for this pattern. Fearful-avoidant attachment is often rooted in early experiences where caregivers were both the source of comfort and the source of fear. Untangling this requires professional support in most cases.
- Build predictability in all relationships. Because your nervous system associates closeness with unpredictability, creating reliable routines and expectations in relationships, even small ones, helps your system recalibrate.
- Work on narrative coherence. The ability to make sense of your contradictory impulses, understanding why you push away what you want most, is a specific predictor of movement toward earned security.
The Role of Personality in How Fast You Change
Not everyone moves toward security at the same pace. Your Big Five personality profile influences both the direction and speed of attachment change.
High Openness accelerates change because it supports psychological flexibility, curiosity about your own patterns, and willingness to try new relational approaches. If you score high on Openness, you may find it easier to engage with therapy, self-reflection, and new relationship dynamics.
High Conscientiousness supports change through consistency and follow-through. Building new attachment patterns requires sustained effort. High Conscientiousness helps you stick with practices like journaling, therapy attendance, and deliberate self-regulation even when they feel unnatural.
High Neuroticism creates both the urgency and the obstacle. Your emotional sensitivity means you feel the cost of insecure attachment acutely, motivating change. But it also means you experience more distress during the process of change itself. Understanding this trade-off helps you be patient with yourself.
Low Agreeableness can slow the transition from avoidant attachment specifically because it reduces natural attunement to others. If you score low on Agreeableness and want to build security, you may need to consciously practice empathic engagement in ways that feel effortful at first.
This is why understanding your full personality profile, not just your attachment label, is essential for effective change. A comprehensive personality assessment reveals which traits are working in your favor and which require more deliberate attention.
What Does Not Work
Not everything that promises attachment change actually delivers it. A few common approaches that research does not support:
- Simply learning your attachment style. Knowledge alone does not create change. Understanding that you are anxiously attached without developing new skills and seeking corrective experiences is like diagnosing a broken bone without setting it.
- Trying to suppress your attachment needs. Avoidantly attached individuals sometimes try to be "less needy" by suppressing their desire for closeness even further. This makes the problem worse, not better. The goal is not to need less. It is to need in healthier ways.
- Seeking change through willpower alone. Attachment patterns are stored in implicit memory and operate automatically. You cannot think your way out of an attachment response any more than you can think your way out of a startle reflex. Change requires new experiences, not just new thoughts.
- Expecting a single relationship to fix everything. While secure relationships are powerful catalysts, placing the burden of your healing entirely on a partner is unfair and unsustainable. Attachment change is your responsibility, even though relationships are the context where it happens.
Measuring Where You Are
Progress in attachment change is gradual and sometimes hard to see from the inside. Here are signs that movement toward security is happening:
- You notice your old patterns activating but can choose a different response more often
- Conflict with your partner feels less existential and more solvable
- You can tolerate uncertainty for longer periods without escalating or withdrawing
- You find it easier to ask for what you need directly
- You recover from relational disruptions more quickly
- You can reflect on your attachment history with coherence and compassion rather than dismissal or overwhelm
Tracking these shifts becomes easier when you have a baseline understanding of your personality and attachment patterns. Plexality's personality assessment measures your Big Five traits across all 10 aspects, maps your archetype, and integrates attachment insights so you can see exactly which dimensions are driving your relational patterns, and which are shifting as you grow.
The Bottom Line
Can you change your attachment style? Yes. Four decades of research confirm it. The path to security is not about erasing your past or becoming a fundamentally different person. It is about building new relational experiences that gradually update your working models of self and others.
Your personality traits influence how that journey unfolds. Your relationship history determines where you start. But the destination, earned secure attachment, is available regardless of your starting point.
The first step is understanding exactly what you are working with. Not just your attachment label, but the full personality architecture beneath it. That is what turns abstract self-awareness into a concrete plan for change.
Take the Plexality assessment to map your personality profile and see how your traits connect to your attachment patterns. Understanding the specific drivers of your relational style is not just interesting. It is the foundation of changing it.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does it take to change your attachment style?
There is no fixed timeline, but research suggests meaningful shifts typically occur over months to years, not days or weeks. Chopik and colleagues (2019) found measurable changes in attachment security over a four-year period, with the strongest shifts occurring in the context of supportive romantic relationships. Therapy can accelerate the process, but lasting change requires repeated corrective experiences that gradually rewire your relational expectations.
Can you change your attachment style without therapy?
Yes. While therapy is one of the most effective paths, research shows that secure romantic relationships, close friendships, and deliberate self-awareness practices can all contribute to attachment change. The key ingredient is repeated experience with someone who responds to your emotional needs consistently and reliably. That said, deeply entrenched patterns, especially fearful-avoidant attachment, often benefit significantly from professional support.
Is attachment style genetic or learned?
Both. Twin studies estimate that roughly 30 to 40 percent of attachment variation has a genetic component, largely through heritable personality traits like Neuroticism and Extraversion that create vulnerability or resilience toward specific attachment patterns. The remaining 60 to 70 percent is shaped by early caregiving experiences and later relationship history. This means your genes set a range of possibility, but your experiences determine where within that range you land.
Can you go from anxious attachment to secure?
Yes. This is one of the most well-documented attachment transitions. Research on earned security shows that individuals who were anxiously attached can develop stable secure attachment through therapy, consistently responsive relationships, and deliberate self-regulation practice. The anxious tendencies may not disappear entirely, but you can develop the capacity to recognize them as signals rather than facts and choose secure responses even when your nervous system is activated.
Does your attachment style affect your personality?
Research shows the influence runs in both directions. Personality traits like Neuroticism create vulnerability toward insecure attachment, while attachment experiences shape personality development over time. Being in a secure relationship is associated with gradual decreases in Neuroticism, while chronic relationship insecurity can amplify negative personality traits. Your attachment style and personality are intertwined, which is why measuring both provides the most complete picture of your relational patterns.
References
-
Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.
-
Chopik, W. J., Edelstein, R. S., & Grimm, K. J. (2019). Longitudinal changes in attachment orientation over a 59-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(4), 598-611. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000167
-
Feeney, B. C. (2007). The dependency paradox in close relationships: Accepting dependence promotes independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 268-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.268
-
Fraley, R. C., Vicary, A. M., Brumbaugh, C. C., & Roisman, G. I. (2011). Patterns of stability in adult attachment: An empirical test of two models of continuity and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 974-992. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024150
-
Johnson, S. M. (2019). Attachment Theory in Practice: Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) with Individuals, Couples, and Families. Guilford Press.
-
Main, M., Hesse, E., & Goldwyn, R. (2008). Studying differences in language usage in recounting attachment history. In H. Steele & M. Steele (Eds.), Clinical Applications of the Adult Attachment Interview (pp. 31-68). Guilford Press.
-
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. Guilford Press.
-
Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the Big Five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003
-
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
-
Roisman, G. I., Padron, E., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2002). Earned-secure attachment status in retrospect and prospect. Child Development, 73(4), 1204-1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00467
-
Shaver, P. R., Lavy, S., Saron, C. D., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Social foundations of the capacity for mindfulness: An attachment perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598389
-
Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., & Albersheim, L. (2000). Attachment security in infancy and early adulthood: A twenty-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 71(3), 684-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00176